(FB/Math/BM – Integral contributed by Sourav Hom Choudhury)
Integrate ∫ 1/[(x²+4)²(x+1)] dx from x = -∞ to x = ∞.
____________________________________________________
That integral is divergent, because of the simple pole at z = -1.
I calculated the integral, interpreted as principal value, with two methods (must for fun but I used Derive for dull routines).
I. Using partial fractions:
We first find a primitive funtion (aka antiderivative aka indeterminate integral):
J(x) ≡ ∫ 1/(x² + 4)² (x + 1) dx =
= ∫ (1 – x)/(5·(x² + 4)²) + (1 – x)/(25·(x² + 4)) + 1/(25·(x + 1)) dx =
= (13/400)·arctan(x/2) – (1/50)·ln(x² + 4) + (1/25)·ln |x + 1|
+ (1/40)·(x + 4)/(x² + 4)
Then by the definition of principal value (see previous post),
P ∫ [-∞,∞] 1/(x² + 4)² (x + 1) dx =
= lim [ε→0+] { lim [x→∞] J(x) – J(-1+ε) + J(-1-ε) – lim [x→-∞] J(x) } =
= lim [ε→0+] { 13π/800 – J(-1+ε) + J(-1-ε) – (-13π/800) } =
= 13π/400 + lim [ε→0+] { – J(-1+ε) + J(-1-ε) }. Now,
– J(-1+ε) + J(-1-ε) =
= -(13/400)·arctan((e – 1)/2) – (13/400)·arctan((e + 1)/2)
+ (1/50)·ln((ε² – 2ε + 5)/(ε² + 2ε + 5))
– (1/20)·ε(ε^2 + 11)/((ε² + 2ε + 5)·(ε² – 2ε + 5))
and from this
lim [ε→0+] { – J(-1+ε) + J(-1-ε) } =
= -(13/400)·arctan(-1/2) – (13/400)·arctan(1/2) + (1/50)·ln 1- (1/20)·0
= 0
so the integral is
P ∫ [-∞,∞] 1/(x² + 4)² (x + 1) dx = 13π/400.
It should be noted that the separat limits lim [ε→0+] J(-1+ε) and [ε→0+] J(-1-ε) do not exist, which is why the integral in the usual sense is divergent.
________________________________
2. By residue calculus:
There is a double pole at z = 2i with residue
lim [z→2i] d/dz { (z – 2i)² / ( (z² + 4)²·(z + 1) ) } =
= lim [z→2i] d/dz { 1 / ( (z + 2i)²·(z + 1) ) } = -1/50 – 13i/800
and a simple pole at z = -1 with residue
lim [z→-1] { 1/(z² + 4)² } = 1/25
so the integral is
P ∫ [-∞,∞] 1/(x² + 4)² (x + 1) dx =
= 2πi*(-1/50 – 13i/800) + πi*(1/25) = 2π*13/800 = 13π/400.
——————————————–
The reason that the pole at z = -1 only gives half the residue:
We start with a integration path consisting of the real interval [-R,-1-ε], a half-circle in negative sense (clockwise) and centre -1 , the real interval [-1+ε,R], and a half-circle in in positive direction (counterclockwise). Then, by the residue theorem,
(*) ∫ [-R,-1-ε] f(x) dx + ∫ [|z+1|=ε] f(z) dz + ∫ [-1+ε,R] f(x) dx
+ ∫ [|z|=R] f(z) dz = 2πi*Res(z=2i, f(z))
∫ [|z|=a] f(z) dz = πi*Res(z=0), integrated over a half-circle in positive sense, since only the 1/z-term in the Laurent expansion contributes. Also ∫ [|z|=R] f(z) dz → 0 as R → ∞, since |f(z)| = O(1/|z|²). From all this and (*), we have
P ∫ [-∞,∞] 1/(x² + 4)² (x + 1) dx =
= lim [ε→0+] { ∫ [-R,-1-ε] f(x) dx + ∫ [-1+ε,R] f(x) dx } =
= – lim [ε→0+] ∫ [|z+1|=ε] f(z) dz + [R→∞] ∫ [|z|=R] f(z) dz
+ 2πi*Res(z=2i, f(z)) = – { – πi*Res(z=0) } + 0 + 2πi*Res(z=2i, f(z)) =
= 2πi*Res(z=2i, f(z)) + πi*Res(z=0).
(Double minus in the first termafter the equality sign since the integration over the small halfcircle around the pole at z = -1 is in the negative sense.)
( There are some typos, which I hope are rather obvious, e g at the end πi*Res(z=0) should be πi*Res(z=-1,f(z)); the pole is at z = -1. )
No matter if some one searches for his vital thing, therefore he/she wants
to be available that in detail, therefore that thing is maintained over here.
Haha this page is very amusing. Your website is very
good. Carry on living it up!
Very soon this website will be famous among all blogging and site-building visitors, ddue
to it’s fastidious posts